"And so Discovery drove on toward Saturn, as often as not pulsating with the cool music of the harpsichord, the frozen thoughts of a brain that had been dust for twice a hundred years." - From 2001 a Space Odyssey by Arthur C Clarke.
Here are some more images of my scratch built Discovery Dragonfly from the novel 2001 a space odyssey by Arthur C Clarke. I based this model off the drawing above. Of course as you can see I used a Liberal amount of artistic license for this one.
You will notice that the three main doors are pointing vertically. The reason is that they are in a locked position. For the doors to open they have to rotate 90º to the left in order to be in a position to open. Just a little idea I came up with.
The Dragonfly configuration very closely matches the description of the Discovery as it was described in the novel.
The wing like appendages are radiators which would dissipate any excess heat produced by the nuclear engine.
Stanley Kubrick eventually rejected this design because well... they looked like wings. Opting instead for the more bone like configuration that we all know and love.
You'll also note that the pod bay doors are in a vertical position. The idea behind this is that they do open and close horizontally. But once they are closed they rotate 90º to a locking position.
If you click on the harpsichord link above it will take you to a piece of music written by Bach which I feel had the movie followed more closely to the novel may very well have been used to play along side the Discovery as this sad melancholy ship moves towards Saturn. I know fanciful thinking but then again isn't that what this is all about?
From Wikipedia"
Stylistically,
the novel generally fleshes out and makes concrete many events left
somewhat enigmatic in the film, as has been noted by many observers.
Vincent LeBrutto has noted that the novel has "strong narrative
structure" which fleshes out the story, while the film is a mainly
visual experience where much remains "symbolic".
Randy Rasmussen has noted that the personality of Heywood Floyd is
different as in Clarke's novel he finds space travel thrilling acting
almost as a "spokesman for Clarke" whereas in the film, he experiences
space travel as "routine" and "tedious."
In the film, Discovery's mission is to Jupiter, not Saturn. Kubrick used Jupiter because he and special effects supervisor Douglas Trumbull could not decide on what they considered to be a convincing model of Saturn's rings for the film. Clarke went on to replace Saturn with Jupiter in the novel's sequel 2010: Odyssey Two. Trumbull later developed a more convincing image of Saturn for his own directorial debut Silent Running.
The
general sequence of the showdown with Hal is different in the film
than in the book. HAL's initial assertion that the AE-35 unit will fail
comes in the film after an extended conversation with David Bowman
about the odd and "melodramatic" "mysteries" and "secrecy" surrounding
the mission, motivated because HAL is required to draw up and send to
Earth a crew psychology report. In the novel it is during the birthday
message to Frank Poole.
In the film, Bowman and Poole decide on their own
to disconnect HAL in context of a plan to restore the allegedly
failing antenna unit in operation. If it does not fail, HAL will be
shown to be malfunctioning. HAL discovers the plan by reading their
lips through the EVA pod window. In Clarke's novel, ground control
orders Bowman and Poole to disconnect HAL should he prove to be
malfunctioning a second time in predicting that the second unit is
going to go bad.
However,
in Clarke's novel, after Poole's death Bowman tries waking up the
other crew members, whereupon HAL opens both the internal and external
airlock doors, suffocating these three and almost killing Bowman. The
film has Bowman, after Poole's murder, go out to rescue him. HAL denies
him reentry and kills the hibernating crew members by turning off
their life-support. In the sequel 2010: Odyssey Two, however, the recounting of the Discovery One mission is changed to the film version.
The
film is generally far more enigmatic about the reason for HAL's
failure, while the novel spells out that HAL is caught up in an internal
conflict because he is ordered to lie about the purpose of the
mission.
Because
of what photographed well, the appearance of the monolith that guided
Moon-watcher and the other 'man-apes' at the beginning of the story was
changed from novel to film. In the novel, this monolith is a
translucent crystal; In the film, it is solid black. The TMA1 and TMA2 monoliths were unchanged.
In the book, HAL became operational on January 12, 1997, but in the movie the year is given as 1992. It has been thought that Kubrick wanted HAL to be the same age as a young bright child, nine years old.
The famous quote that opens the film sequel 2010: The Year We Make Contact - "My God—it's full of stars!" - is actually not in the 2001 film, although it is in the 2001 book.
From Wikipedia"
The spacecraft
is founded on solid, if as-yet unrealized, science. One concession was
made for the purpose of reducing confusion, and that was to eliminate
the huge cooling "wings" which would be needed to radiate the heat
produced by the propulsion system. Stanley Kubrick felt that the audience might interpret the wings as meaning that the spacecraft was intended to fly through an atmosphere.
Discovery was named after Captain Robert Scott's RRS Discovery,
launched 1901; Arthur C. Clarke used to visit the ship when she was
moored in London. It shares its name with a real spacecraft, the Space Shuttle Discovery (OV-103).
It's a little bit ironic, to me at least, that Kubrick rejected what would have been a reasonalble and realistic feature of a long-duration, nuclear-powered spacecraft because he didn't want to even suggest "wings" in a vacuum (and, I suspect, he wanted to suggest a flying skeleton anyway) -- and a decade later, space movie viewers would not only accept, but embrace, the X-wing.
ReplyDeleteBy the way, I like the job you did on the model.
Thanks Don!
ReplyDelete